Cross-browser testing
Every page is opened in Chromium, Firefox and WebKit. Findings name the engine that broke, because a layout can be fine in one and wrong in another.
NewTwenty-two checks on every scan
Automatically find every bug before your users do.
Localnee QA runs your site through real browsers on every commit, then has a vision model review what it captured. Layout breaks, contrast failures, dead buttons and performance regressions land in your pull request before a reviewer opens it.
No credit cardFirst scan in two minutes
ChromiumFirefoxWebKitEdge
fernpath.com/checkout
Scanning 24 pages
3 issues found
Coverage
Everything a release needs checked, checked automatically
Twenty-two classes of problem, checked across three browser engines and four screen sizes. No test scripts to write and nothing to maintain.
Responsive testing
Mobile, tablet, laptop and desktop viewports. A page that breaks at 375px but not 1920px is reported as a breakpoint problem, not a layout bug.
Layout and overflow
Horizontal scrolling, content escaping its container, text clipped by a fixed height, and buttons pushed outside the viewport — all measured, not guessed.
Broken links
Every internal and external link is followed. A dead link in your navigation is reported separately and more severely, because it is on every page.
Console and JavaScript errors
Uncaught exceptions, rejected promises and anything logged at error level, captured from the moment the page starts loading.
Network and API failures
Requests your own pages make that time out or return 4xx and 5xx. The kind of failure that leaves a section silently empty.
Missing images, fonts and icons
Images that render at zero size, webfonts that silently fall back, and icon sprites that never arrived.
Accessibility audit
axe-core against WCAG 2.2 AA, with the offending DOM node and a link to the rule behind every violation.
SEO checks
Titles, meta descriptions and heading structure on every page crawled, so a route that shipped without them does not stay that way.
Security checks
Missing Content-Security-Policy, HSTS and friends, plus HTTPS pages loading insecure resources — which browsers block without telling anyone.
Visual regression
Each scan is compared pixel by pixel against the last one. Catches the deploy that moved your footer 200px when nobody meant to.
Layout shift
Cumulative Layout Shift measured as the page settles, so you find the content that jumps before a visitor mis-clicks because of it.
Process
From a URL to a report in four steps
The numbering here is real: each step depends on the one before it, and the whole sequence runs unattended.
- 01
Paste your URL
That is the whole form. The project name comes from your domain and every check is on by default.
Takes about ten seconds
- 02
Localnee crawls your site
Real browsers follow your links and open every page they find, at each viewport, in each engine.
Three engines, four viewports
- 03
Twenty-two checks run
Layout, errors, links, assets, accessibility, SEO and security — measured against the rendered page, not guessed from the source.
Progress updates as it goes
- 04
Read the report
Findings ordered by severity, each with the page it is on, a screenshot showing it, and what to change.
Critical issues first
Findings
/checkout · 390 × 844 · WebKit
Navigation link to /pricing returned 404. It is in the header, so it is broken on every page.
Confidence measured
The page is 42px wider than the 375px viewport and scrolls sideways.
Confidence measured
Helper text contrast is 2.8:1 against the card background, below the 4.5:1 minimum.
Confidence axe-core
Analysed 24 screenshots · 3 findings kept, 9 filtered
Every finding
Findings you can act on, not a number
A score of 62 tells you nothing. Every finding names the page it is on, the browser and screen size it appeared at, what was measured, and what to change. The same problem seen by three engines is reported once, and critical issues come first.
- Measured, not guessed
- Every finding states how it was detected — scrollWidth against clientWidth, an HTTP status, a contrast ratio.
- Reported once
- Three engines seeing the same broken element is one finding, not three. Different viewports stay separate, because that is useful.
- Worst first
- A report that buries the one critical finding under eighteen minor ones has failed at its job.
- With the evidence
- Open any finding to see the screenshot of the page it was found on, at the size it broke.
The difference
Manual QA does not scale. This does.
The same checks, run the same way, on every commit — instead of whenever someone has the afternoon free.
Traditional QA
- A person clicks the same pages every release
- Only the browser that person has installed
- Bugs found days after the deploy
- Findings live in a spreadsheet
- Accessibility checked once a year, if ever
- Costs scale with headcount
vs
Localnee QA
- Every page checked on every commit
- Chromium, Firefox and WebKit in parallel
- Issues reported before review starts
- Findings tracked, deduplicated and scored
- WCAG 2.2 AA on every single scan
- Costs scale with usage, not team size
FAQ
Questions, answered
Still unsure about something? The docs go deeper, and support replies within a business day.
A URL. Localnee crawls from there, follows your internal links, and works out the rest. There is no script to install and nothing to configure.
Get started
Ready to ship better software?
Point Localnee at a URL and see what it finds. The free plan runs fifty scans a month, needs no credit card, and takes about two minutes to set up.
No credit card · Cancel anytime